Aunt Agony III 090607

Originally posted by rainee:
Personally I feel very strongly towards this...I usually dont go after someone once I know they are attached. Doesnt matter whether they are married or are in a relationship, I just don't have the heart to be the third party. So it doesn't matter how attractive the guy is, once I know he is taken, I am steering my way clear of him and will just see him as a close friend at most.

What about you? What is the limit you set? :mrgreen: Just curious to know hehe :P



Three key points that decide the outcome of a person's relationship:

i) Emotional development (which includes early childhood to relationship experience)
ii) Natal chart showing influence and tendency of innate growth and vulnerability.
iii) Karmic/cosmic lessons

It was said that if all the accounting records in the world is accurate (which is impossible), all records will tally... both debit and credit.

Spiritually, we all have our own cosmic account of debit and credit. How the payment is done is through circumstantial triggering, resulting in action and reaction, choice and option, then consequence and effect.

And if every human plays on the role of the 'I would not go after someone who is attached' - in spiritual accounting, it makes no utter sense because who is going to 'provide the circumstance for payment'?

It doesn't matter who believes in what - what critically matters is 'what role are you playing?' – Are you a provider of lesson/s or are you a receiver of lessons?

Let me illustrate an example:

A third party guy (let's called him A) 'invades' a relationship and succeed. The victim, which is the guy who got dumped (let's called him C), realised that the failure of his relationship is due to neglect. C learns the lesson and move on.

Effectively, A provides a lesson to C and C receives a lesson from A - account balanced.

In reality, a whole lot more things are happening simultaneously. The above example contains only but a rudimentary gist of what I want to say, but does not represent a full picture/explanation as a whole. CloUdiSm has a defined complex model to this, but I won't bore everyone with all my shit because it is so theoretical.

Bottom line is that all is fair in love and war. A successful invasion does not mean that the attack was superior, it could jolly well means that the defence is already feeble.

Cheers